Assessment of European Union countries’ positions in the context of circular economy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25686Abstract
Purpose – Assess the level of the circular economy in EU countries between 2020 and 2023, ranking them according to circular economy indicators and identifying changes in their positions.
Research methodology – The study used the European Commission’s 2023 set of indicators to evaluate the performance of the circular economy across EU countries. Twenty-three indicators were selected based on data availability. Missing data were forecasted using the moving average method to ensure completeness for subsequent analysis. The CRITIC method was then applied to determine indicator weights and rank countries, followed by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate and compare national positions.
Findings – The results show stable circular economy levels across the EU but with clear gaps between leading and lagging countries. Germany, the Netherlands, and Italy perform strongest, while Bulgaria and Romania progress slowly due to structural constraints. Lithuania, Austria, and other mid-tier countries advance gradually, with ranking shifts revealing uneven implementation of the EU Circular Economy Action Plan. Overall, the findings compare national progress and highlight key drivers and barriers to the transition.
Research limitations – The study was constrained by incomplete and inconsistent EU statistical data, which required applying the Moving Average method to estimate missing values. In addition, the absence of a standardised composite indicator framework limited methodological comparability. Future research should prioritise improving data availability and creating unified guidelines for building composite indicators to strengthen reliability and cross-country benchmarking.
Practical implications – The results provide policymakers and industry stakeholders with a clear ranking of EU countries’ progress in implementing circular economy principles, enabling targeted improvement strategies. The proposed methodology can be used to monitor nation- al performance, allocate resources effectively, and develop standardised evaluation frame- works for sustainability initiatives.
Originality/Value – This study integrates the CRITIC and TOPSIS methods with the latest EU indicators – a combination rarely used in circular economy analysis. It offers a comprehensive multi-criteria assessment of EU countries, unlike earlier studies based on single or fragmented indicators.
Keywords:
circular economy, sustainability, European Union, multi-criteria decision-making, CRITIC-TOPSISHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alshemari, A., Breen, L., Quinn, G., & Sivarajah, U. (2020). Can we create a circular pharmaceutical supply chain (CPSC) to reduce medicines waste? Pharmacy, 8(4), Article 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040221
Bassi, F., & Dias, J. G. (2019). The use of circular economy practices in SMEs across the EU. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.019
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
Boorová, B. (2020). Circular economy as a way of sustainable production and consumption. SHS Web of Conferences, 83, Article 01004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208301004
Camilleri, M. A. (2025). Cocreating value through open circular innovation strategies: A results‐driven work plan and future research avenues. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4561–4580. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4216
Colasante, A., D’Adamo, I., Morone, P., & Rosa, P. (2022). Assessing the circularity performance in a European cross-country comparison. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, Article 106730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106730
Das, A. K., Hossain, Md. F., Khan, B. U., Rahman, Md. M., Asad, M. A. Z., & Akter, M. (2025). Circular economy: A sustainable model for waste reduction and wealth creation in the textile supply chain. SPE Polymers, 6(1), Article e10171. https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10171
European Academies Science Advisory Council. (2016). Indicators for a circular economy. German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina. https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Circular_Economy/EASAC_Indicators_web_complete.pdf
European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a revised monitoring framework for the circular economy (2018, January 16, No. COM/2018/029). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A29%3AFIN
European Commission. (2023). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a revised monitoring framework for the circular economy (2023, May 15, No. COM/2023/306). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52023DC0306.
European Union. (n.d.). Circular economy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/glossary/circular-economy.html#:~:text=This%20means%20a%20system%20where,global%20efforts%20on%20sustainable%20development
Eurostat. (n.d.). Circular economy: Overview. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy
Franco, S., & Giannoccaro, I. (2025). Dynamic capabilities and microfoundations to overcome barriers to circular economy implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4392–4408. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4171
Garcia-Bernabeu, A., Hilario-Caballero, A., Pla-Santamaria, D., & Sales-Molina, F. (2020). A process oriented MCDM approach to construct a circular economy composite index. Sustainability, 12(2), Article 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020618
Gudaitė, S. (2022, April 21). Žiedinės ekonomikos principų integravimas paukštininkystės sektoriuje [Integrating the principles of the circular economy in the poultry sector]. In Proceedings of the 19th Conference of Young Scientists “Young Scientist 2022” (pp. 273–278). Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gunarti, T. S., Tujni, B., & Solikin, I. (2023). Determine the material inventory forecasting method based on the smallest error. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 9(4), 691–698. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v9i4.2650
Hajduk, S. (2021). Multi-criteria analysis in the decision-making approach for the linear ordering of urban transport based on TOPSIS technique. Energies, 15(1), Article 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010274
Jayawardana, J., Sandanayake, M., Kulatunga, A. K., Jayasinghe, J. A. S. C., Zhang, G., & Osadith, S. A. U. (2023). Evaluating the circular economy potential of modular construction in developing economies – a life cycle assessment. Sustainability, 15(23), Article 16336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316336
Janik, A., & Szafraniec, M. (2019). Circular economy performance of EMAS organizations in Poland based on an analysis of environmental statements. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 2(1), 536–547.
Kambanou, M. L., Hajoary, P. K., & Lindfors, A. (2025). Supporting start‐ups in the circular economy: An analysis of university‐led incubators in India. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 29(3), 997–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70032
Kanda, W., Klofsten, M., Bienkowska, D., Audretsch, D. B., & Geissdoerfer, M. (2025). Orchestration in mature entrepreneurial ecosystems towards a circular economy: A dynamic capabilities approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4747–4765. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4229
Karakış, E. (2021). Machine selection for a textile company with CRITIC and MAUT methods. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 27, 842–848. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.994697
Kasztelan, A. (2020). How circular are the European economies? A taxonomic analysis based on the INEC (Index of national economies’ circularity). Sustainability, 12(18), Article 7613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187613
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Kraviarová, D., Janošovský, J., & Variny, M. (2024). Multi-criteria evaluation of environmentally friendly alternative fuels. Engineering Proceedings, 64, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc20240640011
Lahti, T., Wincent, J., & Parida, V. (2018). A definition and theoretical review of the circular economy, value creation, and sustainable business models: Where are we now and where should research move in the future? Sustainability, 10(8), Article 2799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082799
Lai, Y. Y., & Lee, Y. M. (2022). Management strategy of plastic wastes in Taiwan. Sustainable Environment Research, 32, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-022-00123-0
Li, A., Guo, C., Gu, J., Hu, Y., Luo, Z., & Yin, X. (2024). Promoting circular economy of the building industry by the use of straw bales: A review. Buildings, 14(5), Article 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051337
Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., & Nogueira, E. (2025). Pathways to circularity: Engagement patterns of European SMEs in the circular economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 3848–3864. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4192
Madyaningarum, N., Saputra, N. B., Trinopiawan, K., Hidayat, A. E., Sari, M., Sari, Y. M., Purwanti, T., Prassanti, R., Laksmana, R. I., & Rahmadani, M. A. (2024). Chemical processing development for radioactive minerals processing facility: A circular economy model. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 14(3), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.3.19633
Mashovic, A., Ignjatovic, J., & Kisin, J. (2022). Circular economy as an imperative of sustainable development in North Macedonia and Serbia. Ecologica, 29(106), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.18485/ecologica.2022.29.106.5
Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., de Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045
Muchangos, L. S. d. (2022). Mapping the circular economy concept and the global south. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00095-0
Murti, Z., Dharmawan, Siswanto, Soedjati, D., Barkah, A., & Rahardjo, P. (2022). Review of the circular economy of plastic waste in various countries and potential applications in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1098, Article 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1098/1/012014
Muscillo, A., Re, S., Gambacorta, S., Ferrara, G., Tagliafierro, N., Borello, E., Rubino, A., & Facchini, A. (2021). Circular city index: An open data analysis to assess the urban circularity preparedness of cities to address the green transition – a study on the Italian municipalities. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.10832
Othman, A. (2022). Towards a circular economy in the Arab region: Development of transformation measurement index. Arab Monetary Fund. https://www.amf.org.ae/sites/default/files/publications/2022-10/Towards%20a%20Circular%20Economy%20in%20the%20Arab%20Region_final.pdf
Özçatalbaş, O. (2023). An evaluation of the transition from linear economy to circular economy. In Sustainable rural development perspective and global challenges. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.107980
Pangsri, P. (2015). Application of the multi criteria decision making methods for project selection. Universal Journal of Management, 3(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujm.2015.030103
Pauliuk, S. (2018). Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001: 2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.019
Phan, T. T. H., Tran, H. Đ., & Pham, H. T. M. (2025). Impact of circular economy practices on financial performance of construction enterprises in Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 15(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2024.5.005
Popović, A., & Radivojević, V. (2022). The circular economy: Principles, strategies and goals. Economics of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5937/ESD2201045P
Rimantho, D., Suyitno, B. M., Pratomo, V. A., Haryanto, G., Prasidha, I. N. T., & Puspita, N. (2023). Circular economy: Barriers and strategy to reduce and manage solid waste in the rural area at Jepara District, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(4), 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180407
Sakdiyah, S. H., Eltivia, N., Riwajanti, N. I., & Ekasari, K. (2021). Forecasting analysis on the impact of pandemic towards cigarette sales. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Management, Business and Economic Conference (AMBEC 2020), (Vol. 183, pp. 263–268). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210717.053
Saraswati, R., Kusumowidagdo, A., Susilowati, Sukirmiyadi, Karaman, N., Ali, M., Zafriana, L., & Teowarang, J. (2025). Mapping the efficiency of Surabaya’s creative industries with data envelopment analysis – a push towards a circular economy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1454, Article 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1454/1/012069
Saravanan, K., & Chandrasekar, T. (2025). Assessing the role of circular economy knowledge, attitudes, and practices in driving sustainable development: A survey of textile industries in Tamil Nadu. Business Strategy & Development, 8(1), Article e70074. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70074
Skvarciany, V., Gudelytė-Žilinskienė, L., Činčikaitė, R., & Seržantė, M. (2025). Kiekybiniai ir ekspertiniai sprendimų metodai socialiniuose moksluose. Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas. https://doi.org/10.20334/2025-030-S
Szalmáné Csete, M., & Esses, D. (2022). Usage of production function in linear economy. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 50(2), 223–226. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.16616
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Food Waste Index Report 2021. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/35280/FoodWaste.pdf
Vishwakarma, A., Dangayach, G. S., Meena, M. L., Gupta, S., Joshi, D., & Jagtap, S. (2024). Can circular healthcare economy be achieved through implementation of sustainable healthcare supply chain practices? Empirical evidence from Indian healthcare sector. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 17(2), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-07-2022-0084
Vranjanac, Ž., Velimirović, L., & Stanković, M. (2022). Guideline for constructing composite indicators that measure circular economy performance. Facta Universitatis, Series: Working and Living Environmental Protection. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUWLEP2201001V
Zilia, F., Andreottola, F. G., Orsi, L., Parolini, M., & Bacenetti, J. (2024). Trash or treasure? A circular business model of recycling plasmix. Circular Economy, 3(2), Article 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2024.100089
Žilinskienė, L., & Žilinskas, T. (2020). Žiedinės ekonomikos ir atliekų teisinio reguliavimo koreliacijos probleminiai aspektai [Problematic aspects of the correlation between the circular economy and waste regulation]. Jurisprudence, 27(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.13165/JUR-20-27-1-05
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.