Building new heritage for the future: investigating community architecture paradigms in contemporary architecture of Iran (1978–2020)
Abstract
Contemporary Iranian architecture in the last forty decades has been influenced by different currents and trends, from modern trends to postmodern and kitsch and attention to regionalism in recent years. Yet, there have been fewer participatory approaches in design and especially community architecture. As an approach, participatory architecture has not been a suitable approach for many architects because they believe the user interference leads the project to a wrong path, and it is a time-consuming process. On the other side, some governments make seductive participation for some political aims. Many recourses in this field talk about the user’s direct participation in the design process, and also many of the cases are not outstanding in contemporary architecture literature. So just a seduce participation occurs during design. Some methods used in this kind are questionnaires, workshops, interviews, etc. Some cases consider involvement during the project’s construction phases (especially in developing countries). Assessing different successful Iranian projects in four recent decades shows a little kind of participatory methods in CA of Iran. The lack of usage of community architecture paradigms leads to not being too good architecture practices. Some projects with a successful appearance made community design principles in the design process. Combining regionalism and community design approaches make responsible and sustainable projects for the future. In this study, by using the PAR research method, the typology of participatory architecture in contemporary Iranian architecture has been analyzed. Seven typologies of participation in the design process show different levels and conditions of participation for users and architects. Some typologies such as interpretive and regional participation consider more values, costumes and user behaviors, and they are more indirect. In the next step, using the case study research method and qualitative analysis by the ATLAS.ti software, the relationship between the concepts of community architecture and its impact on the formation of Iranian architecture has been discussed. Different typologies of participation in architectural cases are wide ranges of successful methods of participation that if far from previous typical involvement consideration in social mobilization and questioner’s procedures. Today, questionnaire participation and social mobilization are named seduce participation (also, in some cases, may be useful). In recent years, the tendency towards participatory design with interpretive and regionalism approaches has increased. Studies show the use of three branches: 1 – Elements of traditional Iranian-Islamic architecture (29 codes), incorporation with the environment (23 codes), use of natural light (17 codes) are the most important reasons for the formation of today’s Iranian architecture. In recent years, by combining the concepts of community architecture (29 codes) with emphasis on identity (4 codes), transparency (4 codes), attention to user needs (3 codes), privacy, sense of belonging, sense of ownership, and sense of unity have become the main criterion of architectural formations. Today, assessing the contemporary architecture of Iran (recent decades) shows the usage of responsible typologies of participation in the design process have a good impact on the built environment, and it also improves the condition of life for user and respects values, culture, costumes, needs and ideas, literature survey and recommends a sustainable future. The most influential factors in contemporary Iranian architectural ideas in recent years include topics such as the Usage of Iranian-Islamic traditional elements, harmony with nature, and natural light. Combining Iranian-Islamic traditional architecture elements (such as courtyards, Koushk, etc.) with community design architectural concepts with solutions such as social spaces, flexibility, platform spaces, courtyards are the most important features of the formation of today’s architecture. Central courtyard, Eyvan, and the Persian garden have been the three main elements of today’s Iranian architecture.
Keyword : community architecture, participatory types, contemporary architecture of Iran, new heritage, regionalism, sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. AIP Journal, 35, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bam Office Complex. (2010). Memar Magazine, 59, 28.
Bam Office Complex. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Bani Masoud, A. (2009). Iranian contemporary architecture: An inquiry into tradition and modernity. Honar-e-Memari Publication.
Bani Masoud, A. (2020). Contemporary architecture in Iran (from 1925) (Persian ed.). Kasra Publication.
Barrow, E., & Murphree, L. (1998). Community conservation research in Africa: Principles and comparative practice (Working Paper No. 8). Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.
Blundel, P., Petrescu, D., & Till, J. (2005). Architecture and participation. Spon Press.
Carlo, G. (2005). Architecture’s public. In P. Blundel, D. Petrescu, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation (pp. 3–22). Spon Press.
Chavis, D., Hogge, J., McMillan, D., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Sense of community through Brunswick’s lens: A first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<24::AID-JCOP2290140104>3.0.CO;2-P
Contemporary Engineering and Architecture of Iran. (1998). Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. Iran.
Cross, N. (1972). Design participation. Academy Edition.
Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons.
Diba, D., Kamelnia, H., Shayan, H., & Mahdavinejad, M. (2006). An approach to the contemporary architecture on Iran. Architecture & Urbanization Journal, 84, 18–30.
Diba, D. (2012). Contemporary architecture of Iran. Architectural Design (AD), 82(3), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1406
Diba, D. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Embassy of the I.R. of Iran in Bangkok. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Embassy of the I.R. of Iran in Tokyo. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Embassy of the I.R. of Iran in Tbilisi. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Embassy of I.R of Iran in Berlin. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Embassy of I.R of Iran in Berlin. (2005). Memar Magazine, 35, 48.
Embassy of the I.R. of Iran in Tbilisi. (2009). Memar Magazine, 55, 56.
Embassy of the I.R. of Iran in Tokyo. (2017). Memar Magazine, 55, 63.
Emaratkhorshid. (n.d.). https://www.emaratkhorshid.com/
Fathy, H. (2003). Building by people (Persian ed.). University of Honar, Tehran, Iran.
Fleming. (2003). Kahn and platonic participation. http://www.newcastle.edu.au
Frampton, K., Correa C., & Robson, D. (2001). Modernity and community: Architecture in the Islamic world. Thames & Hudson, Ltd.
Francis, M. (1988). Proactive practice: Visionary thought and participatory action in environmental change. Places, 12, 60–62.
Friedman, Y. (1970). Mobile architecture, toward a city planned by her residents. Casterman.
Habibi, M., & Rezvani, S. (2005). Participatory urbanism: Theoretical exploration in Iran condition. Fine Arts Journal, 24, 15–24.
Habitat for Orphan Girls. (2014). Memar Magazine, 88, 42.
Habraken, N. (1972). Supports: An alternative to mass housing. Praeger.
Hakim, N. (2018). Contemporary Iranian architectures. IVA-ICRA Publication.
Hamdi, N. (1991). Housing without houses: Participation, flexibility. Enablement Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, Cincinnati, Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco.
Hamdi, N., & Goethert, R. (1997). Action planning for cities: A guide to community practice. Wiley.
Hardie, G. (1988). Community participation based on three dimensional models. Design Studies, 9(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(88)90026-9
Hatch, R. (1984). The scope of social architecture. VNR, Inc.
Horelli, L. (2002). A methodology of participatory planning. In B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 607–623). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hoskyns, T. (2005). City/democracy: Retrieving citizenship. In P. Blundel, D. Petrescu, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation (pp. 117–123). Spon Press.
Isfahan International Cultural Center. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Isfahan International Cultural Center. (2021). Memar Magazine, 125, 14.
Islami, S. Gh. R. (1998). Endogenous development: A model for the process of man-environment transaction [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburg, UK.
Islami, S. Gh. R., & Kamelnia, H. (2013). Community architecture: From theory to practice (Persian ed.). University of Tehran Publisher.
Kamelnia, H., & Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2012). Contemporary architecture - from East to West (Persian ed.). Elm e Memar Publisher.
Kamelnia, H. (2020). Theory of community architecture in contemporary Islamic architecture: Assessing different typologies of ca based on “Architect-user”. Ferdows E Honar Journal of Art, 1(1), 70–86.
Kamelnia, H. (2008). Architecture & community-based design paradigms [PhD thesis, University of Tehran]. Iran.
Mellat Park Cineplex. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Mellat Park Cineplex. (2008). Memar Magazine, 88, 42.
Moatasim, F. (2005). Practice of community architecture: A case study of zone of opportunity housing co-operative, Montreal [Unpublished M.S dissertation]. McGill University.
National Library of Iran. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
National Library of Iran. (1998). Contemporary engineering and architecture of Iran. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Iran.
National Library of Iran. (2005). Memar Magazine, 29.
Noore Mobin Charity Organization G2 Primary School. (2018). Memar Magazine, 112, 54.
Paykar Bonyan Panel Factory. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Presence in Hormoz 1. (2017). Memar Magazine, 106, 58.
Presence in Hormuz 2. (2020). Memar Magazine, 124, 64.
Pretty, J., Gugit, L., Thompson, J., & Scoones, I. (1994). Participatory learning and action: A trainer’s guide. International Institute for Environment and Development.
Qazvin Construction Engineering Disciplinary Organization. (2017). Iran contemporary architecture (D. Diba, Ed.). ABAN Publication.
Rafsanjan Sports Complex. (2017). Iran contemporary architecture (D. Diba, Ed.). ABAN Publication.
Redstorm, J., & Grauers, H. (2006). Toward user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies, 27, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.001
Sanoff, H. (1978). Designing with community participation. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
Sanoff, H. (1979). Design games. William Kaufmann, Inc.
Sanoff, H. (1990). Participatory design theory & technique. Henry Sanoff.
Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sanoff, H. (2001). Participatory action research. Modiriat Shahry (Persian) Journal, 2, 36.
Tabiat Walking Bridge. (2017). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Tabiat Walking Bridge. (2015). Memar Magazine, 94, 56.
Tehran Book Garden. (2017a). IRAN contemporary architecture. ABAN Publication.
Tehran Book Garden. (2017b). Memar Magazine, 106, 54.
Till, J. (2005). The negation of hope. In P. Blundel, D. Petrescu, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation (pp. 23–42). Spon Press.
Toker, Z. (2007). Recent trends in community design: The eminence of participation. Design Studies, 24, 309–323.
Wates, N. (2000). The community planning handbook. Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.008
Wates, N., & Knevitt, Ch. (1987). Community architecture: How people are creating their own environment. Penguin Books Ltd.
Wulz, F. (1986). The concept of participation. In H. Sanoff (Ed.), Participatory design, theory and techniques (pp. 39–48). Book Masters. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(86)90052-9
Zargar, A. (1989). Reconstruction of war-damaged rural areas of Khuzestan, Iran [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. University of York, U.K.