MIVES multi-criteria framework to sustainability index of design for manufacture and assembly
Abstract
Embracing sustainable strategies that consider Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA) has become a rapidly growing trend in urban development. Continued uncertainty on the sustainability assessment of design could drive a series of indecisive decision-making among design alternatives, further disrupting the potential opportunities toward sustainable DfMA. However, there is a lack of research on sustainable design assessments for DfMA and establishing a sustainable index. This research establishes an integrated value model for the sustainability assessment framework and DfMA sustainability index to address this challenge. This model integrates Building Information Modelling (BIM) with MIVES, a customisable Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool. The pilot case of this framework is the retrofit of a commercial building’s façade system, which demonstrated the capability of the proposed framework. Data collection and analysis include the comparisons between five design alternatives. This research furthers previous studies and has three-fold significance: 1) Establishing reasonable multi-criteria for the sustainable DfMA indices; 2) Adapting the MIVES approach for comparative analysis across three building phases to make it compatible with DfMA; 3) developing a quantitative analysis method for sustainable design assessment of DfMA in the construction industry.
Keyword : DfMA, sustainability index, sustainability assessment, MIVES, sustainable design
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ariaratnam, S. T., Piratla, K., Cohen, A., & Olson, M. (2013). Quantification of sustainability index for underground utility infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(12), Article A4013002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000763
Bao, Z. (2023). Developing circularity of construction waste for a sustainable built environment in emerging economies: New insights from China. Developments in the Built Environment, 13, Article 100107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100107
Bao, Z., Laovisutthichai, V., Tan, T., Wang, Q., & Lu, W. (2022). Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) enablers for offsite interior design and construction. Building Research & Information, 50(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.1966734
Berardi, U. (2011). Beyond sustainability assessment systems: Upgrading topics by enlarging the scale of assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2(4), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.5390/SUSB.2011.2.4.276
Bogue, R. (2012). Design for manufacture and assembly: background, capabilities and applications. Assembly Automation, 32(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445151211212262
Boothroyd, G. (2005). Assembly automation and product design. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420027358
Bragança, L., Mateus, R., & Koukkari, H. (2010). Building sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2(7), 2010–2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2072010
Cots, D. B., Pardo-Bosch, F., Blanco, A., Aguado, A., & Pujadas, P. (2022). A systematic review on MIVES: A sustainability-oriented multi-criteria decision-making method. Building and Environment, 223, Article 109515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109515
Desa, U. (2018). Revision of world urbanization prospects. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Dewhurst, N. P. (2010). DFMA the product, then lean the process. In Proceedings of International Forum on Design for Manufacture and Assembly.
Ding, G. K. (2008). Sustainable construction – The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025
Eastwood, M. D., & Haapala, K. R. (2015). A unit process model based methodology to assist product sustainability assessment during design for manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.105
Egiluz, Z., Cuadrado, J., Kortazar, A., & Marcos, I. (2021). Multi-criteria decision-making method for sustainable energy-saving retrofit facade solutions. Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313168
Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Rajoo, S., Olugu, E. U., Nilashi, M., & Turskis, Z. (2020). A fuzzy decision support system for sustainable construction project selection: an integrated FPP-FIS model. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12183
Gao, S., Jin, R., & Lu, W. (2020). Design for manufacture and assembly in construction: a review. Building Research & Information, 48(5), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1660608
Gilani, G. (2020). MCDM approach for assessing the sustainability of buildings’ facades [PhD thesis]. Polytechnic University of Catalonia.
Gilani, G., Blanco, A., & de la Fuente, A. (2017). A new sustainability assessment approach based on stakeholder’s satisfaction for building facades. Energy Procedia, 115, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.006
Gilani, G., Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2019). Towards the façades of the future: A new sustainability assessment approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 290, Article 012075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012075
Gilani, G., Pons, O., & de la Fuente, A. (2022). Sustainability-oriented approach to assist decision makers in building facade management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(1), Article 04021182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002194
Haapio, A. (2012). Towards sustainable urban communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.002
Habibi, S., Valladares, O. P., & Pena, D. (2020). New sustainability assessment model for Intelligent Facade Layers when applied to refurbish school buildings skins. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 42, Article 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100839
Hamilton, I. (2023). Decarbonizing the global buildings sector: Efficiency, Electrification, and Equity. Center on Global Energy Policy.
Han, J., Jiang, P., & Childs, P. R. (2021). Metrics for measuring sustainable product design concepts. Energies, 14(12), Article 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123469
Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2019, Feb). Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons.
Lizarralde, R., Ganzarain, J., & Zubizarreta, M. (2022). Adaptation of the MIVES method for the strategic selection of new technologies at an R&D centre. Focus on the manufacturing sector. Technovation, 115, Article 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102462
Lozano, F., Jurado, J., Lozano-Galant, J., de la Fuente, A., & Turmo, J. (2023). Integration of BIM and Value model for sustainability assessment for application in bridge projects. Automation in Construction, 152, Article 104935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104935
Lu, W., Tan, T., Xu, J., Wang, J., Chen, K., Gao, S., & Xue, F. (2021). Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in construction: The old and the new. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(1–2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1768505
Luiten, G. T., & Fischer, M. A. (1998). Opportunities for computer‐aided design for construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021067
Maleki, B., del Mar Casanovas-Rubio, M., Daniel Tsavdaridis, K., & de la Fuente Antequera, A. (2023). An assessment of sustainability for residential skyscrapers in accordance with a multicriteria decision-making method: Nine Dubai case studies. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 29(4), Article 04023038. https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1559
Moghtadernejad, S., Chouinard, L. E., & Mirza, M. S. (2021). Enhanced façade design: A data-driven approach for decision analysis based on past experiences. Developments in the Built Environment, 5, Article 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100038
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023
Peruzzini, M., & Pellicciari, M. (2018). User experience evaluation model for sustainable manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(6), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2017.1305502
Pons-Valladares, O., del Mar Casanovas-Rubio, M., Armengou, J., & de la Fuente, A. (2023). Approach for sustainability assessment for footbridge construction technologies: Application to the first world D-shape 3D-Printed fiber-reinforced mortar footbridge in Madrid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 394, Article 136369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136369
Pons, O., De la Fuente, A., & Aguado, A. (2016). The use of MIVES as a sustainability assessment MCDM method for architecture and civil engineering applications. Sustainability, 8(5), Article 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050460
Qi, B., Costin, A., & Razkenari, M. (2021). An ontology for manufacturability and constructability of prefabricated component. In ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering 2021 (pp. 745–752). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483893.092
Retzlaff, R. (2008). Green building assessment systems: A framework and comparison for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802380290
Sánchez-Garrido, A. J., Navarro, I. J., & Yepes, V. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on modern methods of construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, Article 129724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724
Šaparauskas, J. (2003). Multiple criteria evaluation of buildings with emphasis on sustainability. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 9(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2003.10531334
Suresh, P., Ramabalan, S., & Natarajan, U. (2016). Integration of DFE and DFMA for the sustainable development of an automotive component. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 9(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2015.1096313
Tan, T., Lu, W. S., Tan, G. Y., Xue, F., Chen, K., Xu, J. Y., Wang, J., & Gao, S. (2020). Construction-oriented design for manufacture and assembly guidelines. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(8), Article 04020085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001877
Tan, T., Mills, G., Papadonikolaki, E., & Liu, Z. N. (2021, Jan). Combining multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with building information modelling (BIM): A review. Automation in Construction, 121, Article 103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103451
Wasim, M., Vaz Serra, P., & Ngo, T. D. (2022). Design for manufacturing and assembly for sustainable, quick and cost-effective prefabricated construction – a review. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), 3014–3022. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1837720
Yang, S., Talekar, T., Sulthan, M. A., & Zhao, Y. F. (2017). A generic sustainability assessment model towards consolidated parts fabricated by additive manufacturing process. Procedia Manufacturing, 10, 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.086