Why conflicts occur in roads and tunnels projects in Norway
Abstract
Conflicts within the Norwegian construction industry have reached unacceptable levels. The grievance of these disputes, whether it is the number of conflicts or the expense involved in these conflicts, is under discussion. This article examines the reasons for these conflicts in a comprehensive and inclusive manner. Twenty-five respondents with expertise and understanding of most conflicts in the Norwegian construction industry were interviewed. Results from a questionnaire sent to 1799 contractors have also been included in this study. Sixteen reasons for disputes were identified out of which four comprised the root causes. Tender specification and contract understanding came in first followed by “final settlement-payment related”, corroborating previous findings. The third and fourth root causes of conflicts were “low priced contracts” and “changes in projects” respectively. Our findings point to design deficiencies and defective contract plans as significant causes of conflicts, confirming the view of construction experts. The third root cause of conflicts might explicate some aspects of the first and second major causes of disputes. It is also important to mention that though this is the general view, one can also see how every group involved in this study interpret major causes of conflicts. Our findings also point to “communication between clients and contractor”, “carried out quantities” and “client restriction to time extension” as among the chief causes of conflicts, confirming the view of construction experts. Client understanding of contractors’ anxiety and quest for sound contracting process are aspects that Norwegian clients are currently engaging in, for the sake of conflict reduction and prevention in future construction projects.
Keyword : disputes, construction, tenders, contracts, conflicts, infrastructure, feasibility, tunnels, roads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
ARCADIS. (2017). Global construction disputes report 2017: Avoiding the same pitfalls. ARCADIS Publications.
ARCADIS. (2018). Global construction disputes report 2018: Does the construction industry learn from its mistakes. ARCADIS Publications.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
BAROK. (1999). Conflicts in the building and construction sector. Building and construction – Recruitment and competence development project.
Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi‐structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x
Brockman, J. L. (2013). Interpersonal conflict in construction: cost, cause, and consequence. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000805
Cakmak, E., & Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical network process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.441
Cheung, S. O., & Pang, K. H. Y. (2013). Anatomy of construction disputes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000532
Driscoll, D. L., Appiah-Yeboah, A., Salib, P., & Rupert, D. J. (2007). Merging qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research: how to and why not. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 3(1), 18-28.
Elmagdobi, M. E., Čulić, N., Beljaković, D., Milajić, A., & Pejičić, G. (2016). Common causes of conflicts in construction projects – comparative analysis of projects in Libya and Serbia. Archives for Technical Sciences, 8(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.7251/afts.2016.0815.033E
Engesæth, A. (2015). Increasing conflict level in the building and construction industry. Bergen: DLA PIPER.
Groven, V., Hafskjær, S., & Ferstad, Ø. B. (2017). Disputes in construction projects. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Grøv, E. (2014). Norwegian contract practice suitable for dealing with unexpected geological conditions. In Norwegian tunneling technology (pp. 129-143). Trondheim: Norwegian Tunneling Society.
Gunnes, S. (2018). Disputes between contractor and owner: Owner withholding of payments. Oslo: Norwegian Association of Heavy Equipment Contractors (MEF).
Haukedalen, A. (2015). The conflict situation in the construction industry. NCC Construction AS.
Hegerberg, A. (2016). Cooperation between public clients and entrepreneurs on conflicts. Norwegian Public Roads Administration.
Henning, J. E. (2015). Selection of contractual forms and mechanisms for conflict management in the Norwegian Public Roads Administration. Norwegian Public Roads Administration.
Homleid, Å. (2016). Contractors meeting Solvik-Olsen Minister of Transport. Byggeindustrien, 18, 84.
Homleid, Å. (2015a, November). An intolerable conflict situation “En uholdbar konfliktsituasjon”. Byggeindustrien.
Homleid, Å. (2015b, November). En uholdbar konfliktsituasjon. Byggeindustrien.
Jaffar, N., Tharim, A., & Shuib, M. (2011). Factors of conflicts in construction industry: A literature review. Procedia Engineering, 20, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.156
Jahren, C. T., & Dammeier, B. F. (1990). Investigation into construction disputes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1990)6:1(39)
Kleivan, E. (1989). NOTCOS: The Norwegian tunneling contract system. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 4(1), 43-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(89)90031-X
Kobbe, H. S. (2016). Disagreements, conflicts and disputes: How to avoid and how to solve? Kluge Advokatfirma AS.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1997). Conflicts, claims and disputes in constrcution. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 4(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021042
Lædre, O. (2015). Is there a case? Prevention and handling of disputes in construction and construction projects (2nd ed.). Trondheim: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS.
Mehany, M. S., & Grigg, N. (2014). Causes of road and bridge construction claims: Analysis of Colorado Department of Transportation Projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 7(2), 04514006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000162
Min, J. H., Jang, W., Han, S. H., & Kim, D. (2018). How conflict occurs and what causes conflict: Conflict analysis framework for public infrastructure project. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000625
Mitkus, S., & Mitkus, T. (2014). Causes of conflicts in a construction industry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 777-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.922
Pavalon, E. I. (1987). ADR: Trial lawyer,s perspective. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1987)1:4(211)
Semple, C., Hartman, F. T., & Jergeas, G. (1994). Constrcution claims and disputes: Causes and cost/time overruns. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 120(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:4(785)
Tabish, S. Z. S., & Jha, K. N. (2018). Beyond the iron triangle in public construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001517
The Construction Industry Institute. (1995). Dispute prevention and resolution techniques in the construction industry. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin.
Thompson, R. M., Vorster, M. C., & Groton, J. P. (2001). Innovations to manage disputes: DRB and NEC. Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2000)16:5(51)