Assessment of economic convergence among countries in the European Union
Abstract
The debate on the presence of economic benefits in the European Union (EU) is not over. The study responds unequivocally to this question, with the intensity of economic development in the countries that joined the European Union in 2004 and beyond twice as high as that of the countries that joined it this year, i.e. the EU’s old ones compared to the new ones; smoothness – 1.1 times and dynamics – 1.6 times. Another important trend for further development is that, as the level of economic development increases, its smoothness is diminishing. In respect of the context of the EP of all EU Members, it turned out that the higher intensity of enlargement was characterised by higher economic levels, with similar homogeneity and almost identical values for the dynamic indicator. The introduction to the article presents the context of the studies, i.e. two groups of EU Community countries are formed according to their level of economic development and the year of their accession to the Community, as well as a survey scheme. The literature review reveals the methods used to analyse the convergence of economic development in these countries, as members of the Community. The research methodology introduces the indicator of economic development of countries and provides a methodology for assessing its dynamics. The empirical part assesses the dynamics of economic development of both groups of countries and identifies trends in terms of convergence. The discussion section summarises the consolidation and destabilising factors in the EU and the importance of the study carried out in this context. The conclusions present the main results of the studies and outline their further directions. The results of the study can be used both in the EU and for the purpose-oriented decisions of its members on further economic development.
Keyword : the economic development of the EU Member States, its intensity, evenness and dynamism
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Breuss, F. (2002, July 4–6). Consequences of EU enlargement for macroeconomic stability in Euroland. In International Conference on Policy Modelling “EcoMod2002”. Universitę Libre de Bruxelles.
Campos, N. F., Coricelli, F., & Moretti, L. (2019). Institutional integration and economic growth in Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 103, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.08.001
Cook, D., & Davíšsdóttir, B. (2021). An appraisal of interlinkages between macro-economic indicators of economic well-being and the sustainable development goals. Ecological Economics, 184, 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106996
Czyżewski, A. B., Orłowski, W. M., & Zienkowski, L. (2003). Macroeconomic costs and benefits of Poland’s Membership in the EU: analysis and evaluation in Costs and Benefits of Poland’s Membership in the European Union. Centrum Europejskie Natolin, Warsaw.
Dhingra, S., Huang, H., Ottaviano, G., Pessoa, J. S., Sampson, T., & Reenen, J. (2017). The costs and benefits of leaving the EU: Trade effects. Economic Policy, 32(92), 651–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eix015
Dobrzanski, P., & Olszewski, L. (2019, May 16–18). Structural change path and economic growth performance of Polish economy. In 11st International Scientific Conference on New Challenges of Economic and Business Development – Incentives for Sustainable Economic Growth (pp. 230–239), Riga, Latvia.
Ginevičius, R., Gedvilaitė, D., & Stasiukynas, A. (2018). Quantitative assessment of the industrial composition in the country’s regions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(5), 2083–2097. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.5696
Ginevičius, R., Nazarko, J., Gedvilaitė, D., & Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2021). Quantifying the economic development dynamics of a country based on the Lorenz curve. Economics and Management, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-1-004
Gryshova, I., Kyzym, M., Hubarieva, I., Khaustova, V., Livinskyi, A., & Koroshenko, M. (2020). Assessment of the EU and Ukraine economic security and its influence on their sustainable economic development. Sustainability, 12, 7692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187692
Horridge, M., & Rokicki, B. (2018). The impact of European Union accession on regional income convergence within the Visegrad countries. Regional Studies, 52(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1333593
Huang, R., Kale, S., Paramati, S. R., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2021). The nexus between financial inclusion and economic development: Comparison of old and new EU member countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.10.007
Hubner, D. (2004). Cohesion and competitiveness are the two necessary ingredients for the Union’s development. (European Union Regional Policy, Newsletter No. 129).
Joergensen, J. G., Luethje, T., & Schroeder, P. J. H. (2001). Trade: The workhorse of integration. In J. D. Hansen (ed.), European integration, an economic perspective. Oxford University Press.
Kalimer, P., Bith, K., Richardson, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2020). Hidden linkages between resources and economy: A“Beyond-GDP” approach using alternative welfare indicators. Ecological Economics, 169, 106508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106508
Kehagia, A., & Kyriazi, F. (2021). Structural funds and regional economic growth: The Greek experience. Review of Economic Analysis, 13(4), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.15353/rea.v13i3.3481
Kokocinska, M., & Puziak, M. (2018). Regional income differences and their evolution after EU accession. The Evidence from Visegrad Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.04.06
Lejour, A. M., de Mooij, R. A., & Nahuis, R. (2001) EU Enlargement: Economic implications for countries and industries (CESifo Working Paper Series 585). CESifo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.287847
Lisiński, M., Augustinaitis, A., Nazarko, L., & Ratajczak, S. (2020). Evaluation of dynamics of economic development in Polish and Lithuanian regions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(4), 1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.12671
Orłowski, W. M. (1998). Road to Europe, macroeconomics for accession to Europe (TIGER Working Paper Series No. 51).
Orłowski, W. M. (2000). Costs and benefits from membership in the European Union, methods, models, estimates. CASE.
Pesa, A., Bosna, J., & Perovic, E. (2017, May 25–27). Economic indicators of the Croatian integration in the European Union. In 6th International Scientific symposium Economy of Eastern Croatia – Vision and Growth, (pp. 918–926), Osijek, Croatia.
Rapacki, R., & Proḥchniak, M. (2008). The EU enlargement and economic growth in the CEE new member countries. https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication14295_en.pdf.
Rosés, J. R., & Wolf, N. (2018). Regional economic development in Europe, 1900–2010: A description of the patterns (CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12749). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180497
Slusarczyk, B. (2018). Tax incentives as a main factor to attract foreign direct investments in Poland. Administrative si Management Public, 30, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2018.30-05
Sokolov Mladenović, S., Mladenović, I., & Cuzović, D. (2019). Distribution trade and economic growth: EU28 evidence for the period 2008–2015. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.9857
Spychala, M. (2020). The absorption of EU funds and the socio-economic development in the subregional dimension in Poland. Research Papers of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 64(3), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2020.3.07
Vasylieva, T., Lyulyov, O., Bilan, Y., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Sustainable economic development and greenhouse gas emissions: the dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, GDP, and corruption. Energies, 12, 3289. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173289