Procyclical economic policy and risks on economic growth sustainability in Romania
Abstract
The current situation of the Romanian economy must be understood beginning from the analysis of the main measures of fiscal-budgetary policy applied over the last years by the public authority. In general, the Romanian fiscal policy (before and after accession) was procyclical. However, we continue by presenting some of its characteristics for the past years when we underwent the last ascending phase of the economic cycle. Actually, Romania’s GDP exceeded constantly the potential level, and the demand surplus became predominant, generating inflationary pressures. Maintaining the expansionist level of the fiscal policy, in the conditions of a positive deviation of GDP, as of 2017, and opting-out regarding the structural deficit target contributed to affecting the stability of public finances, on short- and medium-term. Romania entered into an extremely difficult economic context, generated by the pandemic, with an extremely narrow fiscal space which limited a lot the possibilities of combating the effects of the pandemic. In this paper we analyzed a period limited to the year 2020, because we consider this time as marking the end of an economic cycle in a period of peace and economic calm, as another is about to begin based on the new realities.
First published online 08 February 2024
Keyword : economic growth, inflation, budgetary deficit, trade balance, exchange rate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Banca Națională a României. (n.d.). https://www.curs-valutar-bnr.ro/istoric-curs-valutar
Bergman, U. M., & Hutchison, M. (2015). Economic stabilization in the post-crisis world: are fiscal rules the answer? Journal of International Money and Finance, 52, 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.11.014
Bova, M. E., Carcenac, N., & Guerguil, M. M. (2014). Fiscal rules and the procyclicality of fiscal policy in the developing world. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498305525.001
Bova, E., Medas, P., & Poghosyan, T. (2018). Macroeconomic stability in resource-rich countries: The role of fiscal poli-cy. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, 1(9), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2018.1.5
Calderon, C., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2008). Business cycles and fiscal policies: The role of institutions and financial mar-kets (Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 481). Central Bank of Chile.
Calderón, C., Duncan, R., & Schmidt‐Hebbel, K. (2016). Do good institutions promote countercyclical macroeconomic policies? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(5), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12132
Catao, L., & Sutton, B. (2002). Sovereign defaults: The role of volatility (IMF Working Papers 02/149). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451856903.001
Cimadomo, J. (2016). Real‐time data and fiscal policy analysis: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(2), 302–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12099
Combes, J. L., Minea, A., & Sow, M. (2017). Is fiscal policy always counter-(pro-) cyclical? The role of public debt and fiscal rules. Economic Modelling, 65, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.05.017
Consiliul Fiscal al României. (2019). Raport anual 2019. http://www.consiliulfiscal.ro/RA%20CF%202019.pdf
Croitoru, L. (2015). Cercul vicios al polticii fiscale. https://www.bnr.ro/Studii-4010.aspx
Croitoru, L. (2017). Cu o politică fiscală permanent prociclică am putea pierde democrația și politica monetară. Revista Sinteza. https://www.revistasinteza.ro/cu-o-politica-fiscala-permanent-prociclica-putea-pierde-democratia-si-politica-monetara
Dumitru, I. (2018). Aspecte privind relația politica fiscal-bugetara – creștere economică. http://consiliulfiscal.ro/prezentare_ionut_BNR_AAFBR.pdf
Eyraud, L., Gaspar, V., & Poghosyan, M. T. (2017). Fiscal politics in the euro area. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475572919.001
Fatas, A., & Mihov, I. (2009). The euro and fiscal policy (NBER Working Paper 14722). https://doi.org/10.3386/w14722
Fernandez, A., Guzman, D., Lama, E. R., & Vegh, C. A. (2021). Procyclical fiscal policy and asset market incompleteness (NBER Working paper 29149). https://doi.org/10.3386/w29149
Frankel, J. A., Vegh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2013). On graduation from fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Econom-ics, 100(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.001
Gavin, M., & Perotti, R. (1997). Fiscal policy in Latin America. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12. https://doi.org/10.1086/654320
Georgescu, F. (2017). Conţinutul şi calitatea politicii fiscale – în pas cu evoluţia şi obiectivele societăţii româneşti. Bursa. https://www.bursa.ro/continutul-si-calitatea-politicii-fiscale-in-pas-cu-evolutia-si-obiectivele-societatii-romanesti-23647336
Gootjes, B., & Haan, de J. (2022). Procyclicality of fiscal policy in European Union countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 120, Article 102276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102276
Guerguil, M., Mandon, P., & Tapsoba, R. (2017). Flexible fiscal rules and countercyclical fiscal policy. Journal of Macroeconom-ics, 52, 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.04.007
Havard, H., & Bleaney, M. (2011). Explaining the procyclicality of fiscal policy in developing countries (CREDIT Research Paper No. 11/09). https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/11-09.pdf
Iancu, A., & Olteanu, D. C. (2022). Procyclical and countercyclical fiscal policies in non-Euro EU member countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, XXV(3), 188–205. https://ipe.ro/rjef/rjef3_2022/rjef3_2022p188-205.pdf
Institutul Naţional de Statistică. (n.d.). http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online
Kaminski, G. L., Reinhart, C. M., & Végh, C. A. (2004). When it rains it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic poli-cies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 19, 11–53. https://doi.org/10.1086/ma.19.3585327
Lazea, V. (2017). Guvernul, datorită politicii fiscale prociclice şi a creşterilor salariale a fost nevoit să reducă masiv in-vestiţiile. https://www.economica.net/lazea-guvernul-datorita-politicii-fiscale-prociclice-si-a-cresterilor-salariale-a-fost-nevoit-sa-reduca-masiv-investitiile_145499.html
Mănătescu, D., & Lazăr, D. T. (2014). Estimarea produsului intern brut poetnțial și a decalajului de producție – perspectivă comparată. Amfiteatru economic, XVI(37), 784–797. https://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/ArticolRO.aspx?CodArticol=1326
Musgrave, R. (1959). The theory of public finance. McGraw Hill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23426-4
Nerlich, C., & Heinrich Reuter, W. (2015). Fiscal rules, fiscal space and procyclical fiscal policy (Working Paper Series 1872). European Central Bank. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3409786
Škare, M., & Porada-Rochon, M. (2020). Forecasting financial cycles: Can big data help? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(5), 974–988. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12702
Sorici, C. O. (2009). Regional policy responses to demographic challenges and opportunities. European Research Studies, 12(4), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/251
Talvi, E., & Vegh, C. A. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 156–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002