Share:


Determinants of TFP in the fisheries sector of 28 coastal provinces in Vietnam

    Nguyen Cao Duc   Affiliation
    ; Ha Thi Thu Thuy   Affiliation
    ; Pham Thi Thu Phuong   Affiliation
    ; Le Van Hung   Affiliation
    ; Nguyen Ngoc Trung   Affiliation

Abstract

This study uses annual data of The Enterprise Survey and Provincial Competitiveness Index to analyze determinants of TFP of the fisheries sector and fishery firms in 28 coastal provinces of Vietnam. The paper evaluated the effects of different institutional variables on TFP at the firm level. In addition, impacts of macro variables on sector’s TFP were also analyzed using sector aggregated TFP. Analyses of the study show that the industry’s macro environment and firm characteristics significantly affect the fisheries sector’s productivity. At the macro level, the more transparent the environment is, the higher the TFP. Thus, it is suggested that the local authorities of the coastal provinces of Vietnam need to speed up their reforms in administrative procedures, creating a favorable business environment for firms. At the micro-level, the variable of firm size is positively correlated with the TFP in the fisheries sector. The larger the size of the firm, the higher the productivity. In a labor-intensive industry such as fisheries, productivity increases with labor, indicating a low science and technology application level. To increase the sector’s productivity, state support to expand the application of advanced technologies for domestic firms is essential.

Keyword : coastal provinces, fisheries, TFP, industry, firm

How to Cite
Duc, N. C., Thuy, H. T. T., Phuong, P. T. T., Hung, L. V., & Trung, N. N. (2022). Determinants of TFP in the fisheries sector of 28 coastal provinces in Vietnam. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2022.15885
Published in Issue
Dec 5, 2022
Abstract Views
397
PDF Downloads
321
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ackerberg, D., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2006). Structural identification of production functions. EconPapers. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:38349

Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411–2451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13408

Bhupat, M. D., & Namboodiri, N. V. (1997). Determinants of total factor productivity in Indian agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(52), A165–A171.

Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., & Gobillon, L. (2018). The costs of agglomeration: House and land prices in French cities. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4), 1556–1589. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy063

Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., Puga, D., & Roux, S. (2012). The productivity advantages of large cities: Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection. Econometrica, 80(6), 2543–2594. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8442

Comin, D. (2010). Total factor productivity. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), Economic growth (pp. 260–263). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280823_32

Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Ramalho, R. M. (2006). Regulation and growth. Economics Letters, 92(3), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.021

Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x

Giang, M. H., Xuan, T. D., Trung, B. H., & Que, M. T. (2019). Total factor productivity of agricultural firms in Vietnam and its relevant determinants. Economies, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7010004

Glaeser, E. L., & Resseger, M. G. (2010). The complementarity between cities and skills. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00635.x

Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2013). Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Review of Finance, 17(5), 1617–1648. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs039

Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35(2), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A

Isaksson, A. (2007). Determinants of total factor productivity: A literature review. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 351–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00255-6

Kim, J., Lee, S. J., & Marschke, G. (2009). Inventor productivity and firm size: Evidence from panel data on inventors. Pacific Economic Review, 14(4), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2009.00469.x

Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246

Li, F., Xing, W., Su, M., & Xu, J. (2021). The evolution of China’s marine economic policy and the labor productivity growth momentum of marine economy and its three economic industries. Marine Policy, 134, 104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104777

Mo, J., Qiu, L. D., Zhang, H., & Dong, X. (2021). What you import matters for productivity growth: Experience from Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Economics, 152, 102677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102677

Moaniba, I. M., Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2020). Geographic distance between co-inventors and firm performance: The moderating roles of interfirm and cross-country collaborations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120070

North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.

Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831

Olper, A., Pacca, L., & Curzi, D. (2014). Trade, import competition and productivity growth in the food industry. Food Policy, 49, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.004

Saliola, F., & Şeker, M. (2012). Measuring total factor productivity using micro-level data from enterprise surveys. Enterprise Analysis Unit.

Şeker, M., & Saliola, F. (2018). A cross-country analysis of total factor productivity using micro-level data. Central Bank Review, 18(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2018.01.001

Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047

Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.2.326

Teh, L. C. L., & Sumaila, U. R. (2013). Contribution of marine fisheries to worldwide employment. Fish and Fisheries, 14(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00450.x

Tovar, B., Javier Ramos-Real, F., & de Almeida, E. F. (2011). Firm size and productivity. Evidence from the electricity distribution industry in Brazil. Energy Policy, 39(2), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.001

Van Beveren, I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 98–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x

Vietnam association of seafood exporters and producers. (2021). Report on Vietnam seafood exports in 2020. https://seafood.vasep.com.vn/reports

Wang, S., Lu, B., & Yin, K. (2021). Financial development, productivity, and high-quality development of the marine economy. Marine Policy, 130, 104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104553

Wang, S. L., & Walden, J. B. (2021). Measuring fishery productivity growth in the Northeastern United States 2007–2018. Marine Policy, 128, 104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104467

Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026